Health products where clarity is care

The problems I hear most
- .01
Staff work around the software
When the tool is slower than paper, people keep paper. Workarounds are the clearest sign of a workflow designed without them.
- .02
Patients don't finish what they start
Booking, intake forms and follow-ups fall away when they feel long, clinical or confusing on a phone.
- .03
Critical information hides in plain sight
Alerts, allergies and abnormal results get lost in dense screens that treat everything as equally important.
- .04
Accessibility treated as optional
Older patients, low vision, low literacy, many languages. In health, accessibility is the main audience, not an edge case.
What good looks like in Healthtech
- Clinical screens that show what needs attention first
- Booking and intake flows patients can finish on a phone
- Workflows designed with nurses, doctors and front-desk staff in the room
- Accessible by default: contrast, type size, language and plain words
- Calm, reassuring brand and copy for people who are worried
How I can help
Product & UX Design
Apps, websites and dashboards for products with real complexity underneath. I design the flows first and the pixels second, so the result is calm to use and straightforward to build.
Discuss thisUX Research & Audit
Evidence before opinion. I find out what users actually do, where the product loses them, and which fixes will move the numbers you care about.
Discuss this
Healthtech, asked often
Yes, with care. I work around clinical schedules, use short sessions and follow your consent and privacy requirements. Shadowing a shift is often worth more than any interview.
I design the experience and work alongside your regulatory and clinical teams, who own the compliance decisions. Clear documentation of design decisions helps both sides.
I avoid collecting it. Sessions use test data or anonymised examples, and nothing identifiable leaves your environment.
